I was watching the motion and motive of Indian democracy in its parliamentary proceedings. Today, I witnessed a historical moment in Indian democracy. When the leader of opposition Khargeji made his point in a manner that made speaker leave his chair, and the leader of house sit down. Still I wonder how the nation will react to this historic event.

I have an anticipation that new war will kill more civilians than soldier. Satellites can be directly used in association with AI to target specific geopolitical locations. Threats are greater than ever, stakes are high. This machinery can be used by state and terrorists alike. My estimation in new wars terrorist shall play minor role. What do you think?

A doctor listens to pain of his patient who is ever testing good patience. What’s satisfying is the sense of care and well being, which is rather hard to imagine. An engineer builds new tools that can empower human to dance and be merry. But lost in offices engineers have adopted a system so mechanical that they themselves are nothing more than cogs & nuts.

Dance class: This one I think belongs to actors, artists, authors or someone who has an occupation. An occupation is something that occupies spatiotemporal activities of an economical entity.  Destroy class: These are the servant class, the bureaucrats, even soldiers belong to this class. Their primary job of to obey the orders imposed upon them. They are the one’s who are entrusted to either destroy or prevent the destruction. Even terrorists belong here. Create class: This is where majority population works, the farmers, labourers, educationists, reporters etc. These are jobs that hold respect and other aspects of social belonging together.  None of these are better or worse. They are just there for their sheer necessity. Critically analyse this argument.

The coming weeks will be decisive. Will the government offer real solutions, or will this crisis spiral further? Will the people demand systemic change or accept another cycle of political spectacle? The future is being decided—are you watching or shaping it?

A human being is what he thinks, he communicates. What he communicates is his expression which decides his personality. It’s society that defines human as social animal. Without society a human is just another animal in wilderness.

For years, I wrote, debated, questioned, and deconstructed the systems we live under. I sought answers in governance, in economy, in education—but the deeper I went, the more I realised: change cannot be external alone; it must be internal first. The world does not need another intellectual trapped in academic jargon. It needs thinkers who live their philosophy, who experiment with ideas not just in books but in real life. And so, I have chosen to begin again—not as someone simply theorising change, but as someone becoming that change.

Just by knowing the definition of rationalism, does not make one rational. But by the believing in bad belief one hope to become religious. A person thinks about one’s own world. Quid pro quo, whole world must think about that one person. For that one must learn to read self and the other as one.

A person thinks about one’s own world. Quid pro quo whole world must think about that one person. Perfection is a temporary illusion, a fleeting state in the long arc of evolution. Every society, every system, no matter how ideal its design, carries within it the seeds of its own contradiction.