With reason comes the power of judgement. In judgement lies the freedom of will. Freedom of will leads to doubt. Doubt ascertains existence in the form of thought. The conclusion that Descartes reached to herald the modern philosophical age. The sceptical approach led to further enquiry, which reached its epitome when Sartre condemned us as men to be free. Freedom entrusts responsibility, which binds us to morality. Morality creates divisions, shattering the monistic illusion of unity and harmony, provoking thoughts to further judgements between right and wrong, good and evil, pain and pleasure. The diversity between such contradictions fuels the adventure that is life, which itself is contradicted by death.
Amid all contradictions lies the ultimate unity. If the wrong, the pain, the evil ever existed, death would be the lord of all evil. But death is the divine creator because it is death that creates time and grants meaning to space. Without any ends, immortality will nullify actions. Without the possibility of actions, life loses significance, which ceases the need for reason. And without reason, death becomes desirable – the impossibility of which will be the ultimate curse on life. Death as such may be divine, but godliness lies in life. This brings us to The Eternal Triad of life, truth, and god – from which the fountain of knowledge and wisdom originates and flows in all directions.
[Excerpt: Lifeconomics (Chapter 1)]
Is death immortality?
Death is actually the antithesis of immortality. Immortality refers to the ability to live forever or have an infinite lifespan, while death is the cessation of life. So, in a sense, they are opposites.
Is Shakespeare immortal?
In a way, yes! Shakespeare's works have certainly achieved a kind of immortality through their enduring popularity and influence. His plays and poems continue to be studied, performed, and adapted around the world, ensuring that his legacy lives on for generations to come.
Is Shakespeare alive?
Shakespeare himself is not alive; he lived from 1564 to 1616. However, his works continue to be very much alive through their ongoing presence in literature, theater, and other forms of art and culture.
Dead yet immortal, ironic!
Indeed, it's quite ironic how someone who experienced the finality of death can achieve a form of immortality through their creations. It's a testament to the enduring power of art and literature to transcend the limitations of mortality.
Love made me mortal.
That's a poignant statement! It suggests that experiencing love has brought someone a profound sense of vulnerability or humanity, which is often what love does—it connects us deeply to our emotions and to others, making us feel more alive and yet more fragile. If this is a theme or feeling you're exploring, there's a lot that can be unpacked about how love impacts our perception of ourselves and our lives.
Men die not for love, rather they love to die!
This is an intriguing reflection on the nature of love and sacrifice. It suggests that sometimes people are drawn to the idea of a grand, dramatic gesture—like dying for a cause or a belief, which in itself becomes a form of loving something deeply enough to give everything for it. It touches on themes of heroism, martyrdom, and the lengths to which people will go to prove their dedication or passion, whether in the context of romance, ideals, or other deeply held beliefs. What do you think drives this tendency in people?
I think life in general and men in particular is nothing but an economical decision. Once life feels degradation in its economy, it embraces death with glory. Everything must end sometimes or another, to grant it economical value. Infinity and eternity has no economical value.
That's a fascinating philosophical perspective, tying the concept of value directly to scarcity and the finite nature of existence. By framing life and its decisions in economic terms, you're highlighting how the inherent limits of life—its eventual end—can increase its perceived value, making each moment and decision weigh more significantly. This can also reflect on why people might choose to "die gloriously," as they perceive that act as enhancing or preserving value, either personally or societally.
Your notion that "infinity and eternity has no economical value" is particularly thought-provoking, as it suggests that without an end, things cannot be measured, valued, or truly appreciated. This idea could be a powerful lens through which to view many aspects of human behavior, from risk-taking to how we prioritize what matters most to us. How do you think this concept influences everyday decisions and values?
This concept can either make you fall in love with life, or hate the self. Either way everyday life is the present we live day in and out.
Absolutely, the awareness of life's finite nature can indeed have a profound impact on how individuals approach their daily existence. For some, it can instill a greater appreciation for each moment, encouraging a more mindful, passionate engagement with life. This often leads to a love for life's transient beauty and an eagerness to make the most of the time available.
On the other hand, this same awareness can also lead to existential dread or a sense of futility, particularly if one focuses on the inevitability of the end rather than the journey itself. This might manifest as a dissatisfaction with oneself or one's accomplishments, feeling that nothing is ever quite enough because it is all temporary.
The concept that every day is a present—something to be opened and cherished—captures the potential for joy in embracing the moment. How do you think we can best balance these contrasting feelings to lead a fulfilling life?
More awareness and less judgement. Acceptance of the key to joy.
That's a very wise approach. Increasing awareness and reducing judgment can lead to a more accepting and appreciative attitude towards life. When we're more aware, we're better able to notice the details and nuances of our experiences, which can enrich our understanding and enjoyment. This mindfulness helps us to be present in the moment rather than constantly evaluating or comparing.
Acceptance plays a crucial role in finding joy and contentment. By accepting ourselves, others, and the nature of life, we can reduce the stress and disappointment that often come from resisting reality or clinging to unmet expectations. It allows us to embrace what is, rather than being stuck on what could have been or should be.
Such an approach can make life not only more bearable but also more beautiful, fostering a deeper connection to the world around us and within us. How do you practice or envision practicing these principles in your own life?
I am an author, I write the present I live in and leave the judgement to the pages. It concludes itself well enough without bothering about past or future. Anyways the story without a moral is not worth ending.
That sounds like a thoughtful and immersive way to approach both life and writing. As an author, capturing the present in your narratives allows you to explore and express the nuances of the human experience authentically. Letting the story conclude itself naturally on the page reflects a deep trust in the process of storytelling and an acceptance of how things unfold, much like in life.
Indeed, the idea that every story should have a moral adds a layer of purpose to your writing, giving both you and your readers something valuable to take away. This method not only enriches your stories but can also provide a framework for readers to reflect on their own lives and decisions.
What kinds of themes or morals do you find yourself returning to in your writing? How do you think these reflect your views on life and existence?
The core of my literature is powered by philosophy, particularly epistemological angle together with social and political philosophy. I am trying to work on applied philosophy. Ethics though in narration is subtle yet evident by the end as moral message I intend to deliver to this democracy. My point of concern is the optimal needs that seems challenged in democratic structure. The concept of welfare state challenges me to think and solve the problems of life to meet death with dignity.
Your literary focus is not only ambitious but also deeply meaningful. Tackling such significant themes through the lens of applied philosophy can offer readers new perspectives on pressing issues like democracy, ethics, and welfare. By delving into these topics, you're inviting a dialogue on how societies can better meet the fundamental needs of their members, which is crucial in addressing the concept of living and dying with dignity.
The intersection of epistemology with social and political philosophy in your work can illuminate how knowledge itself is constructed and used within these systems, and the ethical implications that arise from it. This approach could challenge and inspire readers to think critically about their own societal roles and the structure of their governments.
Considering your focus on the welfare state and its challenges, exploring how different democratic systems succeed or fail in providing for their citizens might provide fertile ground for your narratives. How do you envision translating these complex philosophical debates into engaging stories that resonate with your readers?